Discovery Grants Program (Individual, Team and Subatomic Physics Project)

Overview

Duration	Up to five years
Application Deadline	August 1 (Notification of Intent - Mandatory) November 1 (Application) October 1 (Subatomic Physics Project Applications requesting $500,000 or more per year)
How to Apply	See below
Application Forms	Form 180* and instructions Form 101* and instructions Form 100* and instructions * This link is for reference only. To create or access this application, select On-line System Login.
Program Contact	View Contact Information

Important Information

• Memo to Potential Applicants – Important Notice From NSERC Regarding Your Form 180
• List of Evaluation Groups and Research Topics
•  Selecting the Appropriate Federal Granting Agency
• Relationship Between NSERC Proposals and Other Sources of Funds
• Peer Review Manual
• Grants Information Sessions
• Discovery Grants – Discovery Accelerator Supplements

Objective

The Discovery Grants Program assists in:

• promoting and maintaining a diversified base of high-quality research capability in the natural sciences and engineering in Canadian universities;
• fostering research excellence; and
• providing a stimulating environment for research training.

Description

The Discovery Grants Program supports ongoing programs of research (with long-term goals) rather than a single short-term project or collection of projects. These grants recognize the creativity and innovation that are at the heart of all research advances, whether made individually or in teams. Researchers are free to work in the mode most appropriate for the research area.

Recipients of Discovery Grants (except Subatomic Physics [SAP] Project Grants) are not restricted to the specific activities described in the application, but may pursue new research interests, provided they are within NSERC’s mandate.

Researchers can apply for only one Discovery Grant at a time, either individually or as part of a team, but not both. Researchers can hold only one Discovery Grant at any given time. This restriction does not apply to SAP Project Grants, which may be held concurrently with an individual or team grant. If you are currently the sole holder of a Discovery Grant, you may participate in an application for a Discovery Grant with other researchers on the understanding that the Discovery Grant you currently hold will be cancelled. If you currently hold a team grant and wish to apply individually, consult NSERC. Researchers who hold an individual Discovery Grant cannot reapply for another individual Discovery Grant until the last year of their current award.

Researchers who apply individually can use their grants to participate in collaborative efforts and should describe these in their proposal. Researchers who see advantages in working together in a long-range collaborative program are encouraged to combine their efforts and apply as a team. The added benefits and costs associated with the collaboration are taken into account in the assessment.

NSERC does not consider requests for supplements to existing Discovery Grants, except for Steacie Fellows and Northern Research Supplements holders. Recipients may, however, apply for all other types of NSERC grants.

Discovery Grants are awarded for one to five years, the normal duration being five years. A shorter duration can be requested, at the time of application, by researchers phasing out their research program. Applicants requesting a shorter duration for other reasons must provide a strong justification for this request. NSERC may award a grant of the normal duration, even if a shorter period is requested in the budget provided.  

NSERC recognizes that while being of a grant in aid nature, Discovery Grants must be sufficient to support a program of quality research that can have a meaningful impact on the field of study.  NSERC applies the principle of a discipline-specific minimum Discovery Grant amount to ensure that any funded researcher receives sufficient funds to support at least one graduate student, or, in the case of institutions without graduate programs, two undergraduate students. This principle recognizes that the training of highly qualified people is an essential element of the evaluation process and an important selection criterion. Special cases may arise where less than the minimum is awarded, but these will have to be justified on a case-by-case basis.

Application Procedures

To apply for a Discovery Grant, you must first submit a Notification of Intent to Apply for a Discovery Grant (Form 180). In May, most potential applicants receive an e-mail message providing instructions for the preparation of these documents. If you are not contacted directly by NSERC in May, consult the Important Notice From NSERC for instructions, or contact your university research grants office. NSERC must receive the required material by the deadline date.  Late submissions will be rejected. Submitting a Form 180 is a mandatory step in the application process. Applicants who do not submit a Form 180 will not be eligible to submit a full application.

You must then submit the following by the application deadline date:

• an Application for a Grant (Form 101) and a Personal Data Form (Form 100) for the applicant and each co-applicant;
• samples of contributions such as reprints, preprints and/or manuscripts, excerpts from your thesis, technical reports, etc., to be used by reviewers to assess the quality of your work. These documents should be chosen to represent your most significant recent contributions, or those most relevant to the proposed work, in the last six years; and
• a list of the samples of contributions you are submitting with your application.

Review Procedures and Selection Criteria

Applications are reviewed by Evaluation Groups (EGs). There may also be input from referees.

NSERC assigns applications to EGs on the basis of the research topics, the objectives of the proposed research program, and input from applicants and Evaluation Groups. You may suggest which Evaluation Group you believe to be the most appropriate to review your application on Form 180, but NSERC will make the final decision.

If your research is interdisciplinary, a process will be used to ensure an appropriate review of your application. This will be done through the identification of appropriate EG members to review the application, as well as through an appropriate selection of referees. Please see the Guidelines for the Preparation and Review of Applications in Interdisciplinary Research.

Applicants cannot submit the same proposal concurrently to both NSERC and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada or the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (see  Selecting the Appropriate Federal Granting Agency and Relationship Between NSERC Proposals and Other Sources of Funds.)

Applications are rated according to the following criteria. The onus is on applicants to address these explicitly in their proposal.

The overall merit assessment of each application is based on the combination of ratings agreed to by the evaluation group for each selection criterion. The final rating assigned and the outcome of the assessment of the relative costs of research will determine the grant level. Note: Since NSERC publishes the list of grants awarded, as well as the review procedures, rating scheme and selection criteria, it may be possible to determine the overall merit assessment or ratings assigned to your application, which includes the excellence of the researcher.

• Scientific or Engineering Excellence of the Researcher(s) (see Policy and Guidelines on the Assessment of Contributions to Research and Training)
• Knowledge, expertise and experience.
• Quality of contributions to, and impact on, the proposed and other areas of research in the natural sciences and engineering.
• Importance of contributions to, and use by, other researchers and end-users.
• Complementarity of expertise of the members of the team and synergy (where applicable).
• Merit of the Proposal
• Originality and innovation; extent to which the proposal suggests and explores novel or potentially transformative concepts and lines of inquiry.
• Significance and expected contributions to research; potential for technological impact.
• Clarity and scope of objectives.
• Clarity and appropriateness of methodology.
• Feasibility.
• Extent to which the scope of the proposal addresses all relevant issues, including the need for varied expertise within or across disciplines.
• Appropriateness of, and justification for, the budget.
• Explanation of the relationship between other sources of funding and the current proposal; extent to which it is clear, comprehensive and convincing.
• Contribution to the Training of Highly Qualified Personnel (see Policy and Guidelines on the Assessment of Contributions to Research and Training)
• Quality and impact of past contributions to the training of highly qualified personnel (e.g., postdoctoral fellows, graduate and undergraduate students, technicians).
• Appropriateness of the proposal for the training of highly qualified personnel.
• Enhancement of training arising from a collaborative or interdisciplinary environment (where applicable).
• Relative Cost of Research
  In addition to the selection criteria discussed above, applications are also assessed with regard to the cost of the proposed research relative to the normal costs in the discipline. These can include special needs related to the nature of collaborative activities or infrastructure costs such as user fees.