On January 16, 2024, the Government of Canada published its Policy on Sensitive Technology Research and Affiliations of Concern. This funding opportunity is in scope of this new policy, wherein grant applications that involve conducting research that aims to advance a sensitive technology research area will not be funded if any of the researchers involved in activities supported by the grant are currently affiliated with, or in receipt of funding or in-kind support from, a named research organization.
This prize is considered a research grant for the purposes of this policy. If the prize will support research activities that aim to advance a listed sensitive technology research area, prize recipients will be required to comply with the policy and submit attestation forms to NSERC.
Please read the Tri-agency Guidance on the STRAC Policy to understand how this policy may impact your grant.
Nomination deadline: December 6, 2024, 8:00 pm (ET).
The Synergy Awards for Innovation honour partnerships of strong, complementary and collaborative teams who have generated new knowledge and accelerated the application of research results to create benefits for Canada and Canadians. The awards recognize outstanding teams who have combined their expertise and resources to create partnerships resulting in significant impacts.
Synergy Awards for Innovation include two categories:
Synergy Awards are an opportunity to showcase what Canadian ingenuity and collaboration can accomplish.
NSERC is acting on the evidence that achieving a more equitable, diverse and inclusive Canadian research enterprise is essential to creating the excellent, innovative and impactful research necessary to advance knowledge and understanding, and to respond to local, national and global challenges. This principle informs the commitments described in the Tri-agency statement on equity, diversity and inclusion and is aligned with the objectives of the Tri-agency EDI Action Plan.
For University partnerships:
For College partnerships:
Partnerships involving both eligible Canadian colleges and universities and one or more partnering organizations are eligible. The partnership should be presented under the category – University partnerships or College partnerships – corresponding to the nominee’s affiliation.
An individual (nominee or co-nominee) may be nominated for the Synergy Awards for Innovation and other NSERC prizes (Herzberg, Polanyi, McDonald, Brockhouse or Strickland) in the same year but can only win one prize in a given year. There is no limit to the number of nominations for the Synergy Awards for Innovation that a university or college can put forward in a given competition.
Partnerships may be nominated by any individual or group. Self-nominations (either by a nominee, co-nominee or one of the partnering organizations) will not be accepted. For a college, the nominator cannot be the college’s research grants officer.
NSERC strongly encourages nominators and university officials to consider equity, diversity and inclusion in their nomination processes.
Since nominations are reviewed by a multidisciplinary committee, the nomination material should be written for non-specialists.
The nomination package must include the following:*
† Academic institutions are not considered partnering organizations.
*You may use this checklist to ensure the nomination package is complete.
Nominators are responsible for assembling the required documentation, which must adhere to the General presentation guidelines. Documents must be assembled in a single portable document format (PDF) in the order outlined above. Documents that do not meet the presentation standards may be rejected or at a disadvantage in comparison with those that meet the presentation standards. Only the requested documents will be made available to the selection committee; any additional material will be removed.
Nominations must be submitted electronically via the Secure Submission for NSERC’s Synergy Awards for Innovation site before 8:00 pm (ET) on the deadline date. Only submit a single PDF document (do not upload PDF portfolios). Late nominations will not be accepted. Once you have submitted your nomination, you will not be able to update it.
Collection of self-identification data
The collection of self-identification data is a central piece of the agencies' commitment to equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI). This data provides information on the diversity of the population applying for and receiving agency funds and is important for monitoring the fairness of our programs and informing future measures to increase EDI among all those involved in the research enterprise. The questionnaire covers eight dimensions: age, gender identity, sexual orientation, Indigenous identity, visible minority identity, population group, disability and language. Completion of the questionnaire is mandatory, however, each question includes the option “I prefer not to answer.” Self-identification data will not be seen or used by NSERC peer reviewers, and choosing to self-identify has no bearing on the outcome of the nomination. A link to the questionnaire will be sent to nominees and co-nominees once the nomination package has been received.
All eligible nominations will be reviewed by a selection committee of distinguished academic, government, not-for-profit and industry research representatives from a variety of disciplines. Committee members are selected according to NSERC’s Guidelines Governing Membership of NSERC’s Peer Review Committees.
The selection committee will review your nomination, using merit indicators to rate each of the following equally weighted criteria, and will recommend the winning partnerships to NSERC.
1. Partnership (25%)
2. Impact and benefits for the partner organization(s) (25%)
3. Training (25%)
4. Impact and benefits to Canada (25%)
As a signatory of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), NSERC recognizes that scholarly contributions are not limited to published journal articles but can also include, amongst other contributions, article preprints, datasets, software, protocols, well-trained researchers, societal outcomes and policy changes resulting from research.
Surrogate measures of quality and impact, such as the prestige of a publication venue or citation-based metrics (e.g., journal impact factor or h-index), must not be used as they introduce bias in the merit review process. Indicators of the impact of research contributions include influence on the direction of thought and/or activity of other researchers, in the specific field, in the discipline as a whole or in other disciplines, or beyond academia. Impact can be seen as advancing knowledge, developing technology, addressing socio-economic or environmental needs, or increases to equitable and inclusive participation in the research ecosystem, among other things. The relevance of such considerations may differ depending on the discipline and the nature of the research being conducted.
The nomination should clearly describe the quality and impact of the partnership within this larger context for the multidisciplinary selection committee members.
The names of the award recipients will be announced at a public ceremony.
The recipient will be asked to report on the impact that the award has had on their research activities.
Nominees/co-nominees
Before you, as a nominee (or co-nominee if at a university), can submit your documents to the nominator, you must read and agree to the Terms and conditions form for nominees. It is your responsibility to retain a copy of the agreed terms and conditions for your records.
Nominators
Before you, as a nominator, can submit your documents to NSERC, you must read and agree to the Terms and conditions form for nominators. It is your responsibility to retain a copy of the agreed terms and conditions for your records.
Partnering organizations
By signing and submitting a letter, the authorized individual certifies that the partnering organization: