Learn more about Plastics science for a cleaner future.
See Who can apply? to determine whether you are eligible to apply.
Submit your application through NSERC’s Online System. The application includes three components:
Your application must be received at your institution’s research grants office by their internal deadline date; contact your research grants office for those deadlines.
Your application must be received at NSERC by 8:00pm (Eastern Time) on the deadline date. If it is not received by the deadline, it will be considered late and will be rejected. The application deadline is indicated in the program description, as well as under the Overview section of the Call for proposals and on the Notice of decision.
Material or updates received under separate cover (before or after the deadline date) will not be accepted.
If you have questions about the program:
If you have questions about the NSERC Online System:
Titles below will guide you through the modules listed in NSERC’s On-line System.
Title of proposal
Provide a title that describes the subject of the research in language that the public can understand. Spell out scientific symbols and acronyms. Do not include a company or trade name. The title will be made available to the public if your proposal is funded.
Select a primary research subject code. You may add a secondary research code (optional).
Area of application codes
Select a primary area of application code. You may add a secondary area of application code (optional).
Key words
Provide a maximum of 10 key words that describe the proposal (e.g., nuclear physics, geochemistry, etc.).
Before completing this section, consult the Requirements for Certain Types of Research.
Research involving humans: If you select Yes, you must provide your institution's administration with the appropriate certification indicating that research involving humans has been reviewed and has received the required approval.
Research involving human pluripotent stem cells: If you select Yes, or if through peer review the application is found to fall into this category and is recommended for funding, it will be forwarded, with your consent, to CIHR’s Stem Cell Oversight Committee (SCOC) to ensure compliance with Chapter 12, Section F of the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (TCPS 2). The SCOC review is in addition to the normal review by local research ethics boards (REBs). Funding will not be released until approval has been obtained from the SCOC.
Research involving the use of animals: If you select Yes, you must provide your institution's administration with the certification from the animal care committee at the institution that the experimental procedures proposed have been approved and that the care and treatment of animals is in accordance with the principles outlined in the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) guide.
Research involving hazardous substances: If you select Yes, you must provide your institution's administration with the certification from the biosafety committee at the institution that the laboratory procedures being used comply with the safety precautions necessary for the level of containment required by the research.
Environmental impact: The Impact Assessment Form (Appendix A) may be required. For more information, consult NSERC’s Guidelines on Impact Assessment.
Attach a cover letter if you wish to provide NSERC with information that will not be shared with external reviewers. Include in your cover letter your name, the NSERC program to which you are applying, and the title of your application.
Indicate co-applicants who will participate in your application. Co-applicants will automatically be invited to provide their Personal Data Form with CCV attachment (Form 100A).
Enter the email address and family name of the co-applicant, as these should appear in the co-applicant’s Form 100A. This allows the co-applicants access to your application. When you select Save, an automated email message will be sent to the co-applicants, informing them that they have been invited to participate in your application. The status of their participation will appear as Not Linked.
When co-applicants link a Personal Data Form with CCV Attachment (F100A) to the application, their personal information will appear on the Co-applicant page, and the status will change to Linked.
Advise co-applicants outside your institution that the authorized officer of their institution must agree to their participation. NSERC will confirm this agreement directly with the authorized officer.
Indicate any collaborators — Examples of collaborators are: government scientists, academic researchers or company staff members. Collaborators contribute to the overall intellectual direction of the research project and bring their own resources to the collaboration. The collaborator will not have access to the grant funds and must be qualified to undertake research independently.
On behalf of your collaborators, you may attach a biographical sketch or CV for collaborators and key staff of partner organizations (if applicable) whose role in the project is similar to that of a co-applicant. In a maximum of two pages for each person, provide the individual’s name/affiliation, education/training, employment/affiliations, research funding, and up to five significant contributions related to the project.
Note: For upload purposes, all collaborator biographical sketches or CVs must be saved as a single PDF file.
Write a summary of the proposed research, intended to explain the proposal in language that the public can understand.
Using simple terms, briefly describe the nature of the work. Indicate why and to whom the research is important, and describe the anticipated outcomes and advancements that will result, and how the field and Canada will benefit.
This plain-language summary will be made available to the public if your proposal is funded. The summary can be submitted in one official language or both official languages, at the applicant’s discretion.
The summary must fit in the field provided in Application for a Grant - Form 101.
Complete the proposal template. The maximum number of pages is 12 (this limit does not include references). If you choose not to use the template, you must include the section headings and the text of the bullets from the proposal template. You must also respect the page limits and the guidelines outlined in the NSERC Online Presentation and Attachment Standards.
Pages exceeding the maximum or documents not requested by NSERC (e.g., letters of support) will be removed and will not be taken into account in the assessment of the application. NSERC reserves the right to reject applications exceeding the maximum number of pages.
In preparing your proposal, address the evaluation criteria that will be considered when evaluating the application.
If relevant to your research, consult NSERC’s Guidelines for the Preparation and Review of Applications in Interdisciplinary Research and/or Guidelines for the Preparation and Review of Applications in Engineering and the Applied Sciences.
To complete these sections:
In the Proposed expenditures section, enter the planned spending in each budget category for each year of the project.
For the Budget justification, prepare a separate document that provides a breakdown of each category and a detailed justification for spending in each category. Provide sufficient information to allow reviewers to assess whether the resources requested are appropriate. Attach the document in the Budget justification section. This section should only contain information that is pertinent to the budget. You should provid e a summary of all expenditures related to aspects incorporated into the proposal that are outside the natural sciences and engineering. These expenditures must not exceed 30 percent of the total project costs.
The categories are as follows.
Salaries and benefits
Give the names (if known), categories of employment, proposed salaries, and non-discretionary benefits) of students, postdoctoral fellows, research staff such as technical/professional assistants and the project manager. Briefly describe the responsibilities of each position and indicate the percentage of time they will be spending on this project over its life span. Do not include salaries of faculty in project costs.
Consult Form 100A instructions for information on obtaining consent to name individuals in your proposal.
Equipment or facility
Give a breakdown of the items requested. Provide details on models, manufacturers, prices and applicable taxes. Justify the need for each item requested. Describe any fees for the use of equipment or a facility (e.g., hours and rate).
Materials and supplies
Provide details of materials and explain major items. Equipment and materials obtained from the partner organizations must be provided as in-kind contributions.
Travel
Explain briefly how each planned travel activity relates to the proposed research.
Dissemination and knowledge mobilization
Provide details of publication costs, user workshops or other activities that support collaboration and knowledge mobilization related to the project.
Technology transfer activities
List the expenditure for field trials, prototypes, scale-up costs, demonstration projects, workshops and other activities to develop and grow the research collaborations.
Use this page to provide the contributions committed by partner organizations to the research project and to invite the partner organizations to complete a Partner Organization Form. The invitation will be sent to the authorized contact.
Provide information required for each partner organization. List the resources the partner organization will provide for proposed research, including:
When completed, this section will also generate an invitation to the contact person at the partner organization. When you send the invitation, the contact person will receive an email with a link to NSERC’s Online System, where they will be asked to complete a Partner Organization Form providing information about their organization.
Important: You must upload a “Justification for in-kind contributions” attachment. While the inclusion of partners and in-kind contributions are optional for this call, the system will not allow you to submit your application without this attachment. If in-kind contributions are being provided, please describe them as outlined in the instructions. If there are no in-kind contributions being provided, you must upload a blank document.
Provide a detailed explanation of all in-kind contributions.
Use this section if you need to provide other documents requested by NSERC.
Note: For upload purposes, all other documents must be saved as a single PDF file.
An Impact Assessment Form (Appendix A) must be completed and uploaded to the Environmental impact page, as required.
To complete this section, suggest the names of five independent experts competent to assess the technical aspects of the proposal. This list should include experts from the academic community and non-academic community such as the government sector and the industrial sector. Also include reviewers competent to assess any research aspects outside the natural sciences and engineering. This list should also take into consideration equity, diversity and inclusion; for example, the list should include women.
Give the name, address, telephone number, email address and the area(s) of expertise of potential external reviewers.
External reviewers should be able to review the proposal in the language in which it is written.
Suggested external reviewers should not be in a conflict of interest. Refer to the Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Policy of the Federal Research Funding Organizations for more information. In addition, reviewers must sign the Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Agreement for Review Committee Members, External Reviewers, and Observers before they access the application material.
You can request that an individual, a group of individuals, or a specific non-academic organization not be involved in the review of your application (optional). Specify a general reason for this request (e.g., perceived conflict of interest, prior disputes, school of thought bias, professional or personal association not specified in the Conflict of Interest Policy). You may include in this list any exclusions requested by the partner organizations.
While NSERC cannot be bound by this information, it will take it into consideration in the selection of reviewers. NSERC may also exclude reviewers because of conflict of interest, as described in the Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Policy of the Federal Research Funding Organizations.
Note: Information concerning exclusions may be accessible to those individuals named in this section, under the Privacy Act.
The collection, use and disclosure of personal information provided to NSERC are outlined in the following policy statements:
The information you provide in your application is collected under the authority of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Act. Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Health Canada (HC) and NSERC are subject to the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act. The information you provide is stored in a series of NSERC data banks described in Information about programs and information holdings. You must ensure that others listed in the application have agreed to be included.
Personnel from ECCC and HC will have access to relevant data and records for the purposes consistent with program objectives.
All applications will be evaluated against the established evaluation criteria (see below). The Selection Panel will use the same criteria and statement sets to evaluate the proposals. Each criterion is of equal value.
Criterion 1: Merit of the proposed activities
Applicant(s) should discuss the importance of the specific problem being addressed and the extent to which the proposed activities will contribute to the initiative’s research objectives and the extent to which new knowledge generated will impact the field of research. The quality, originality and feasibility of the proposed activities will be assessed here as well as the extent to which new knowledge generated will impact the field of research. Open access and open data commitments will be highly regarded.
When reviewing this criterion, the following points should be considered:
The proposed project:
Criterion 2: Competence of the research team
The research team must have all the expertise to address the defined objectives and complete the project successfully. The contributions of individuals to the research effort must be clear, their expertise appropriate to the proposed project. Their track record in transferring research results to a user sector should also be described (will be considered in the assessment of the “knowledge mobilization plan”). Team composition must take into account equity, diversity and inclusion. Interdisciplinarity is strongly encouraged and will be highly regarded.
When reviewing this criterion, the following points should be considered:
The research team is:
Criterion 3: Relevance to Canada
The research activities should generate results that will further knowledge, contribute exploitable research results, provide benefits to Canada and stakeholders, as well as support the program objectives described above. Demonstrated policy-relevancy will be highly regarded.
When reviewing this criterion, the following points should be considered:
The proposed outcomes are:
Criterion 4: Knowledge mobilization plan
The proposal must include a knowledge mobilization plan that includes mechanisms to share new knowledge generated with knowledge users. Direct collaboration with knowledge users will be highly regarded. Consideration will be given to the researchers’ track record in transferring research results to a user sector.
When reviewing this criterion, the following points should be considered:
The knowledge mobilization plan will be assessed on the following points using the scale 1 to 6 given below:
Criterion 5: Contribution to training
The project must contribute to the training of students and/or postdoctoral fellows with skills that will serve to increase research capacity on plastics pollution and its impacts. The project must have appropriate measures to advance equity, diversity and inclusion within the project’s training activities.
When reviewing this criterion, the following points should be considered:
The proposed project:
Criterion 6: Project work plan
The project work plan must be clear, coherent, and achievable and the budget must be justified to support the proposed research activities. The proposal must include a detailed explanation and justification for each budget item. The budget must reflect the importance of the Contribution to training criterion.
When reviewing this criterion, the following points should be considered:
The project work plan:
NSERC does not require original signatures on applications or other documents submitted electronically through its On-line System. The electronic submission of applications through this system represents approval and replaces the traditional "physical" or "wet" signatures. Refer to the Frequently Asked Questions in the Program Guide for Professors for more details.
For applicants and co-applicants
Before you, as an applicant or co-applicant, can submit your application to NSERC or link your Personal Data Form with CCV attachment to an application, you must read and agree to the Terms and Conditions of Applying that appear in a pop-up window during the submission process.
The signature of the institutional authority certifies that:
Before you, as the authorized representative of the partner organization, submit information as part of an application to NSERC, you must read and agree to the Terms and Conditions of Applying that appear in a pop-up window during the submission process.